David Alan Harvey and a True Story…

20 thoughts on “David Alan Harvey and a True Story…”

  1. This is not so true sorry to tell you. Capa to MacCurry to Harvey Magnum permits setup fotos from this fotografers. I know because I live in Rio and have saw it. Payed models in this “perfect compositions.”

    1. “Mrs Da Silva!
      Good God lady!!!!
      , no offense here but before you clearly ACCUSE anyone about anything plz do a home research..
      “living in Rio as u claim,
      do does not make u an expert on Magnum affairs , or Nat Geo affairs..”

      So now let’s go straight into your SOUR GRAPES , demeaning unfounded hater comment above..
      You insisted that “magnum”!!??? paid models ( Geezus Christ ) for Rio!!!????!!!..
      Listen Amiga: 1) David was working on his personal vision book and NatGeo story ( why blasting Magnum???)
      2) I’m really laughing at your ignorance and pure jealousy writing this post.. DAH does NOT need me or anyone defending him but since i followed Rio closely I’ll tell u this.. Check CNN .. The main photo on CNN of the girl kissing a guy “actor” as you “reveal” in your “investigation” mrs Sherlock Holmes :) ( yes yes pun intended ).. Well that “paid actor” is my good friend Lance that volunteered to help David in Rio and the “actress” is another great friend which is a DOCTOR btw and not a model …
      I can go on and on explaing to you …but mrs E, before you TRASH someone/anyone ( individual or even Magnum agency as you just blasted ) please please think twice before you post , but you made me laugh so hard with your poisonous ignorance that I forgive you
      ….
      ( and remember just because I live in Athens Greece does not mean I’m the Expert on Athenian matters, so stop acting like you’re the mayor of RIO , the absolute authority)
      ps: I’m hope you’re not a judge or a cop coz then I feel sorry for your future victims.. Plz re-tune your judgments .. Your “guitar” and voice is totally out if tune and nobody needs that!
      Love u !!!”
      Panos

  2. For those who know me will know what i mean when i say “HaHa”…

    Before talking and contextualising images created by photographers I would love to talk about “Becoming a Master Photographer” and “Being made a Master photographer”…

  3. Umm. the title of the work is “Based on a True Story,” key part for those with reading comprehension issues is “Based on.” Its making was extensively documented in Harvey’s “Rio” blog. No hidden mysteries about how it was made or its relationship to “truth.”

  4. Elian de Silva

    what in the world did you see?

    i paid no models for the photography you see from Rio..

    Now my unpaid assistants (volunteers) who worked with me everyday were definitely subjects for some of my work…key muses in the (based on a true story) novella set with Rio as the backdrop…they are for sure a key part of this book…i list them in the back of the book as “characters”…

    the backdrop of the Rio you see was shot mostly for NatGeo and i would be fired immediately if i set up pictures with paid models…..i have shot 40 stories for NatGeo and have a clean reputation in the business…again, i am not sure what you saw or what you think you saw, but an allegation like that needs substantiation….

    so??

    cheers, david

  5. Mrs Da Silva!
    Good lady , no offense here but before you clearly ACCUSE anyone about anything plz do a home research..
    “living in Rio as u claim,
    do does not make u an expert on Magnum affairs , or Nat Geo affairs..”

    So now let’s go straight into your SOUR GRAPES , demeaning unfounded hater comment above..
    You insisted that “magnum”!!??? paid models ( Geezus Christ ) for Rio!!!????!!!..
    Listen Amiga: 1) David was working on his personal vision book and NatGeo story ( why blasting Magnum???)
    2) I’m really laughing at your ignorance and pure jealousy writing this post.. DAH does NOT need me or anyone defending him but since i followed Rio closely I’ll tell u this.. Check CNN .. The main photo on CNN of the girl kissing a guy “actor” as you “reveal” in your “investigation” mrs Sherlock Holmes :) ( yes yes pun intended ).. Well that “paid actor” is my good friend Lance that volunteered to help David in Rio and the “actress” is another great friend which is a DOCTOR btw and not a model …
    I can go on and on explaing to you …but mrs E, before you TRASH someone/anyone ( individual or even Magnum agency as you just blasted ) please please think twice before you post , but you made me laugh so hard with your poisonous ignorance that I forgive you
    ….
    ( and remember just because I live in Athens Greece does not mean I’m the Expert on Athenian matters, so stop acting like you’re the mayor of RIO , the absolute authority)
    ps: I’m hope you’re not a judge or a cop coz then I feel sorry for your future victims.. Plz re-tune your judgments .. Your “guitar” and voice is totally out if tune and nobody needs that!
    Love u !!!

  6. I’m late getting back to this and see David has already answered your question. It’s just insane to question whether David Alan Harvey would hire a model to fake an editorial shoot. That just shows a monumental ignorance of the history of photojournalism and David’s place in it. On the other hand, were he to hire models for something like “Based on a True Story,” there would be nothing wrong with that whatsoever. It’s all about the labeling. It was no secret whatsoever that some of the Rio photos featured his friends and assistants. Nor was it any secret that the photos of the gunmen in the favelas were real. I was mistaken when I said above that there was no mystery. No, the work has plenty of mystery. That’s one of it’s strengths. But unethical secrets about paying models to fake editorial? No.

    1. mw…I hope you are not accusing me of editorial ignorance? If you check my bonafides you will know that I can list two cover stories for TIME Magazine and work for the New York Times as well as The Australian, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Canberra Times etc etc in my resume… I do know a thing or two about editorial work and I would consider David as a friend…

      I also realise it is insane NOT to question anyone that has had such a damaging and libellous comment levelled at them and NOT give them the right of reply (as all well trained journalists and photojournalists know is absolutely fundamental to their job) Leaping to David’s defence without questioning him merely shows a bias and a gross negligence in trying to establish facts… and while it would indeed seem extremely out of character for David to fudge anything and indeed ‘Nightswim’, in my mind and rather long experience of seeing photos, would seem impossible to fabricate, stranger things have happened…

      I have asked Mr/Mrs/Ms Da Silva to verify their statement… one would assume if its just mere trolling then they will never be heard of again… but in a democratic society everyone has a right to their say… whether they can corroborate that or not is another thing…

      1. Was I accusing you of editorial ignorance? I don’t think so. But you seem to be accusing me of jumping to his defense without doing any research. Quite the contrary. David’s Rio project is something I have researched quite thoroughly and I am quite comfortable with the facts. And this was not difficult research. You could have easily checked the story before publishing it on your site or doing your bleg. The idea that competing claims are due equivalence without any kind of relationship to the facts is a tragic misunderstanding of journalism 101. Everyone has a right to their say, but every one does not have a right to have their obvious bullshit taken seriously, much less to have it published without any fact checking.

        One should do one’s fact checking before publishing libelous claims, not after. Now those spurious accusations will live forever in Google.

      2. No I wasn’t accusing you of rushing to David’s defence without doing your research… you obviously follow David Alan Harvey’s adventures ardently.

        I had a serious allegation raised on this blog and I needed David to reply to it and by giving his version of events ultimately refuting it. He has done. I am still waiting to hear from Eliane Da Silva but like anything else she/he needs to corroborate their evidence. Her/his silence in this matter indicates they are not prepared to do that. The discerning mind can draw their own conclusions from that.

        A journalist simply has to take it seriously when they hear someone has an eyewitness account as Eliane Da Silva has unequivocally stated.

        I simply don’t have time to research everything anyone puts out there and while I know David is a superstar to emerging photographers I am not privy to what he does all the time. I have not followed his blog about Rio at all because I have had my own projects to work on and other concerns to deal with.

        The quickest way to address this issue was to allow David to refute the claims in his own words. He has done.

        If your idea of journalism 101 is to only publish one side of the story because it involves a famous person when someone unknown claims they have an eyewitness account of something they may or may not have done then good luck with your future in the industry. May I suggest that Fox News is now recruiting…

  7. Eliane da Silva..

    I was reluctant to jump in the discussion and extend this comment session around your point , cause seems that your opinion shared here was create in such superficial, poisoning, shallow, vagrant way, so distant of truth and far from what everyone knows about David Alan Harvey as professional. It seemed ridiculous to give you some attention and part of my time, when all I did when I’ve read your lines was to laugh.
    But I came to apologize to you, cause I understood I was being harsh, once it must not be your fault such ignorant statement. You mustn’t have understood at all, you must’ve gotten confused and jumped on precipitated conclusions. Anyway, hope we can help you in this one ;

    Eliane, I was working as David’s fixer during the production of this book . 24 hours and all the crew , almost a family, living intensively together. I was really close all the process , so you hardly could find another opinion more accurate with the truths behind the scenes.
    David took photographs of me, my sister, his digital assistant, other assistants and other girls and friends. We were part of his days and this novella, but nobody was a paid model. THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS BOOK IS THAT IT IS A PERSONAL STORY. David photographed his friends for sure but just as muses, as friends, AND ANYBODY WHO GOES TO http://www.theriobook,com can see exactly how it was. No secrets at all. Just jump there and you’ll have the answers you need

    Photographers throughout history have photographed their friends: Sally Mann, Nan Goldin, Diane Arbus, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Duane Michaels, Jock Sturges, Nicholas Nixon, Imogene Cunningham, Edward Steichen, Robert Frank etc etc etc…on and on and on… I don’t think photographing friends should be in the same category as “paid models” Besides of that , the title (based on a true story) right off indicates this essay is PERSONAL…not intended as a story on RIO. The word RIO is not even in the book!!!

    And Eliane…not just me, but all cariocas they are so happy with this book… I hope you will too being from Rio yourself , after you understands it better and have a copy to appreciate it . Anyway, send me an email at roberta_prod@yahoo.com.br and I bet David will be happy to sit down , to talk, and to give you a copy when he’s in Rio again.

  8. DAH made it all very clear from the beginning and all the way through as the book was being made. The entire process was open for everyone to see and is still right there on the net. He was hanging out with friends in Rio, taking pictures of them as well as people on the street. That’s what he does – it’s the very essence of his work. He records what happens around him and includes friends and family and what is more beautiful than that?

    1. Jenny David has stated his case…I wouldn’t have published Eliane Da Silva’s comment except for the fact she/he/it expressed the fact they actually witnessed something first hand.

      Just because a lot of the photography world follows David’s every movement doesn’t mean everybody in this world does.

      I have no idea what was even behind the Rio book so I came to the work for the first time at the Australian Center for Photography. Other than that I don’t really give a rats what the process to arrive at the photos on the wall was… I didn’t get a chance to hear David’s talk and I haven’t been following his blog as I have had more important things to deal with.

      As for the amount of defence David needs in this matter, I asked him to comment on the accusation he has and if there is no proof for the accusation forthcoming then we can simply dismiss Eliane Da Silva as a troll.

      It was just such a shocking thing to say I believed it needed to be addressed directly by David. He has done so, so no-one need continue with this unless I receive evidence its true. Which is just improbable really…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s